en
Steven Poole

Unspeak

Beri tahu saya ketika buku ditambahkan
Untuk membaca buku ini unggah file EPUB atau FB2 ke Bookmate. Bagaimana cara mengunggah buku?
“A sharply articulated, well-documented expos of the political and economic manipulation of language … Fans of Orwell, take heart.”—Kirkus Reviews
What do the phrases “pro-life,” “intelligent design,” and “the war on terror” have in common? Each of them is a name for something that smuggles in a highly charged political opinion. Words and phrases that function in this special way go by many names. Some writers call them “evaluative-descriptive terms.” Others talk of “terministic screens” or discuss the way debates are “framed.” Author Steven Poole calls them Unspeak. Unspeak represents an attempt by politicians, interest groups, and business corporations to say something without saying it, without getting into an argument and so having to justify itself. At the same time, it tries to unspeak—in the sense of erasing or silencing—any possible opposing point of view by laying a claim right at the start to only one way of looking at a problem. Recalling the vocabulary of George Orwell’s 1984, as an Unspeak phrase becomes a widely used term of public debate, it saturates the mind with one viewpoint while simultaneously makes an opposing view ever more difficult to enunciate.
In this fascinating book, Poole traces modern Unspeak and reveals how the evolution of language changes the way we think.
Unspeak deserves a place in every journalist’s vocabulary.”—Slate
“This book takes no word at face value, which will anger some and enlighten others, just as a book of social and linguistic commentary should.”—Publishers Weekly
“As we approach yet another political campaign season, this remarkable new book examines the intersection where words and politics collide.”—Tucson Citizen
Buku ini saat ini tidak tersedia
362 halaman cetak
Publikasi asli
2007
Tahun publikasi
2007
Sudahkah Anda membacanya? Bagaimanakah menurut Anda?
👍👎

Kutipan

  • Alberto Peraltamembuat kutipan7 tahun yang lalu
    The philosopher’s name was Confucius, and he was referring to a phenomenon that is all around us today. He was talking about Unspeak.
    Let’s see how it works. What do the phrases ‘pro-choice’, ‘tax relief’, and ‘Friends of the Earth’ have in common? They are all names that also contain political arguments, in a way that alternative names – say, ‘opposed to the criminalisation of abortion’, ‘tax reduction’, or ‘a group of environmental campaigners’ – do not.
    Campaigners against abortion had from the early 1970s described their position as defending a ‘right to life’. The opposing camp, previously known as ‘pro-abortionists’, then renamed their position ‘pro-choice’, rhetorically softening what they favoured. Defending a woman’s ‘right to choose’ whether to have a baby or not, the slogan ‘pro-choice’ appealed to an apparently inviolable concept of individual responsibility. It sought to cast adversaries as ‘anti-choice’: as interfering, patriarchal dictators. However, the phrase also carried unfortunate associations with the consumerist ideal of ‘choice’, as though choosing cereals in a supermarket were an appropriate model for ethics
  • Alberto Peraltamembuat kutipan7 tahun yang lalu
    He cut me off. ‘That’s not the way the world really works anymore,’ he continued. ‘We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality – judiciously, as you will – we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out.84
  • Alberto Peraltamembuat kutipan7 tahun yang lalu
    Another realm in which ‘the judicious study of discernible reality’ was held in contempt, for example, was that of science.
fb2epub
Seret dan letakkan file Anda (maksimal 5 sekaligus)